A Comparison of Microbial Contact Bioassay With Conventional Elutriate Assays for Evaluation of Wastes Hazard

Svetlana Selivanovskaya; Polina Galitskaya; Sylvia Schnell; Yung Tse Hung

doi:10.1504/IJEWM.2010.033992

A Comparison of Microbial Contact Bioassay With Conventional Elutriate Assays for Evaluation of Wastes Hazard

Svetlana Selivanovskaya
, Polina Galitskaya
, Sylvia Schnell
, Yung Tse Hung

Kazan Federal University
Justus Liebig University Giessen

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

The aim of this investigation was to develop a battery of bioassays - contact and elutriate tests with Bacillus pumilus, elutriate tests with Daphnia magna and Paramecium caudatum, for the assessment of the wastes' toxicity. The contact test with B. pumilus was more sensitive than the elutriate test. The estimated LID10 were much higher for Daphnia and Bacillus tests than for Paramecium test. No correlation was determined between the data files of bioassays and of the chemical analysis of the waste. The procedure for classifying the wastes into the hazard classes by calculating LID10 in the Bacillus test was proposed. Copyright © 2010 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.

Original language	American English
Journal	International Journal of Environment and Waste Management
Volume	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEWM.2010.033992
State	Published - Jan 1 2010

Keywords

Bacillus pumilus
Bioassay
Daphnia magna
Industrial wastes
Paramecium caudatum

Disciplines

Civil and Environmental Engineering

Access to Document

10.1504/IJEWM.2010.033992License: CC BY

https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEWM.2010.033992

Cite this

@article{287e6c512cb34664b3167efd9899f60c,

title = "A Comparison of Microbial Contact Bioassay With Conventional Elutriate Assays for Evaluation of Wastes Hazard",

abstract = " The aim of this investigation was to develop a battery of bioassays - contact and elutriate tests with Bacillus pumilus, elutriate tests with Daphnia magna and Paramecium caudatum, for the assessment of the wastes' toxicity. The contact test with B. pumilus was more sensitive than the elutriate test. The estimated LID10 were much higher for Daphnia and Bacillus tests than for Paramecium test. No correlation was determined between the data files of bioassays and of the chemical analysis of the waste. The procedure for classifying the wastes into the hazard classes by calculating LID10 in the Bacillus test was proposed. Copyright {\textcopyright} 2010 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.",

keywords = "Bacillus pumilus, Bioassay, Daphnia magna, Industrial wastes, Paramecium caudatum",

author = "Svetlana Selivanovskaya and Polina Galitskaya and Sylvia Schnell and Hung, \{Yung Tse\}",

year = "2010",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1504/IJEWM.2010.033992",

language = "American English",

volume = "6",

journal = "International Journal of Environment and Waste Management",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Comparison of Microbial Contact Bioassay With Conventional Elutriate Assays for Evaluation of Wastes Hazard

AU - Selivanovskaya, Svetlana

AU - Galitskaya, Polina

AU - Schnell, Sylvia

AU - Hung, Yung Tse

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - The aim of this investigation was to develop a battery of bioassays - contact and elutriate tests with Bacillus pumilus, elutriate tests with Daphnia magna and Paramecium caudatum, for the assessment of the wastes' toxicity. The contact test with B. pumilus was more sensitive than the elutriate test. The estimated LID10 were much higher for Daphnia and Bacillus tests than for Paramecium test. No correlation was determined between the data files of bioassays and of the chemical analysis of the waste. The procedure for classifying the wastes into the hazard classes by calculating LID10 in the Bacillus test was proposed. Copyright © 2010 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.

AB - The aim of this investigation was to develop a battery of bioassays - contact and elutriate tests with Bacillus pumilus, elutriate tests with Daphnia magna and Paramecium caudatum, for the assessment of the wastes' toxicity. The contact test with B. pumilus was more sensitive than the elutriate test. The estimated LID10 were much higher for Daphnia and Bacillus tests than for Paramecium test. No correlation was determined between the data files of bioassays and of the chemical analysis of the waste. The procedure for classifying the wastes into the hazard classes by calculating LID10 in the Bacillus test was proposed. Copyright © 2010 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.

KW - Bacillus pumilus

KW - Bioassay

KW - Daphnia magna

KW - Industrial wastes

KW - Paramecium caudatum

UR - https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/encee_facpub/138

UR - https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEWM.2010.033992

U2 - 10.1504/IJEWM.2010.033992

DO - 10.1504/IJEWM.2010.033992

M3 - Article

VL - 6

JO - International Journal of Environment and Waste Management

JF - International Journal of Environment and Waste Management

ER -

A Comparison of Microbial Contact Bioassay With Conventional Elutriate Assays for Evaluation of Wastes Hazard

Abstract

Keywords

Disciplines

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this