Bad News, Good News for the First Amendment, in Supreme Court Review of the 1993-94 Term,

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    With the passage of the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act (F.A.C.E.), and the Supreme Court’s decision in NOW v. Scheidler, pro-life activists who engage in civil disobedience will suffer far greater legal disabilities than have been placed upon other protest movements in American history. But following Madsen, pro-life demonstrators can now take advantage of protections not previously articulated by the Court. So long as they do not engage in repetitive illegalities, pro-life demonstrators can count on strong First Amendment guarantees.

    Original languageAmerican English
    JournalEssays on Our Times
    StatePublished - Mar 1 1995

    Keywords

    • abortion clinic protestors
    • freedom of speech
    • Madsen v. Women's Health Center Inc.
    • demonstrators

    Disciplines

    • First Amendment

    Cite this