Abstract
In Martin v. Corporation of the Presiding Bishop, 747 N.E. 2d 131 (Mass. 2001), the highest court in Massachusetts rules that the Dover Amendment, a state statutes that denies local government the authority to "prohibit, regulate, or restrict the use of land or structures for religious purposes..." authorized the town of Belmont to grant a church special permission to build a steeple for a newly built Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints temple that was taller than the local zoning provisions would normally allow. Since Martin involved a Massachusetts statute, normally the decision would evoke limited interest, and would have little precedential value in other states. Yet the U.S. Congress has ensured, in a new law, that many communities will soon face the same basic issue in the Martin case: Should zoning accommodate religious uses or vice- versa?
| Original language | American English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Land Use Law Zoning Digest |
| Volume | 53 |
| State | Published - Jan 1 2001 |
Keywords
- Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act
- religious accommodation
- zoning
Disciplines
- First Amendment
- Land Use Law
- Urban Studies
Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS