Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Case Commentary - Martin v. Corporation of the Presiding Bishop: Should Zoning Accommodate Religious Uses or Vice Versa?

    Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

    Abstract

    In Martin v. Corporation of the Presiding Bishop, 747 N.E. 2d 131 (Mass. 2001), the highest court in Massachusetts rules that the Dover Amendment, a state statutes that denies local government the authority to "prohibit, regulate, or restrict the use of land or structures for religious purposes..." authorized the town of Belmont to grant a church special permission to build a steeple for a newly built Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints temple that was taller than the local zoning provisions would normally allow. Since Martin involved a Massachusetts statute, normally the decision would evoke limited interest, and would have little precedential value in other states. Yet the U.S. Congress has ensured, in a new law, that many communities will soon face the same basic issue in the Martin case: Should zoning accommodate religious uses or vice- versa?

    Original languageAmerican English
    JournalLand Use Law Zoning Digest
    Volume53
    StatePublished - Jan 1 2001

    Keywords

    • Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act
    • religious accommodation
    • zoning

    Disciplines

    • First Amendment
    • Land Use Law
    • Urban Studies

    Cite this