Comments on Why Punitive Damages Don't Deter Corporate Misconduct Effectively

Michael Wells

Comments on Why Punitive Damages Don't Deter Corporate Misconduct Effectively

University of Georgia School of Law

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Professor Elliott begins his Article by proclaiming that “a fundamental revolution has reshaped the intellectual underpinnings of tort law.”

Original language	American English
Journal	Default journal
State	Published - Jan 1 1989
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

Tort Law
Punitive Damages
Corporate Liability

Disciplines

Business Organizations Law
Torts

Access to Document

FulltextFinal published version, 454 KBLicense: CC BY

Cite this

@article{c1184a59af20415dbb012c1f4ff29800,

title = "Comments on Why Punitive Damages Don't Deter Corporate Misconduct Effectively",

abstract = " Professor Elliott begins his Article by proclaiming that “a fundamental revolution has reshaped the intellectual underpinnings of tort law.”",

keywords = "Tort Law, Punitive Damages, Corporate Liability",

author = "Michael Wells",

year = "1989",

month = jan,

day = "1",

language = "American English",

journal = "Default journal",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comments on Why Punitive Damages Don't Deter Corporate Misconduct Effectively

AU - Wells, Michael

PY - 1989/1/1

Y1 - 1989/1/1

N2 - Professor Elliott begins his Article by proclaiming that “a fundamental revolution has reshaped the intellectual underpinnings of tort law.”

AB - Professor Elliott begins his Article by proclaiming that “a fundamental revolution has reshaped the intellectual underpinnings of tort law.”

KW - Tort Law

KW - Punitive Damages

KW - Corporate Liability

UR - https://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/fac_artchop/620

M3 - Article

JO - Default journal

JF - Default journal

ER -

Comments on Why Punitive Damages Don't Deter Corporate Misconduct Effectively

Abstract

Keywords

Disciplines

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this