Comments on Why Punitive Damages Don't Deter Corporate Misconduct Effectively

Michael Wells

Comments on Why Punitive Damages Don't Deter Corporate Misconduct Effectively

Michael Wells

University of Georgia School of Law

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Professor Elliott begins his Article by proclaiming that “a fundamental revolution has reshaped the intellectual underpinnings of tort law.”

Original language	American English
Journal	Default journal
State	Published - Jan 1 1989
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

Tort Law
Punitive Damages
Corporate Liability

Disciplines

Business Organizations Law
Torts

Access to Document

FulltextFinal published version, 454 KBLicense: CC BY

Cite this

@article{c1184a59af20415dbb012c1f4ff29800,

title = "Comments on Why Punitive Damages Don't Deter Corporate Misconduct Effectively",

abstract = " Professor Elliott begins his Article by proclaiming that “a fundamental revolution has reshaped the intellectual underpinnings of tort law.”",

keywords = "Tort Law, Punitive Damages, Corporate Liability",

author = "Michael Wells",

year = "1989",

month = jan,

day = "1",

language = "American English",

journal = "Default journal",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comments on Why Punitive Damages Don't Deter Corporate Misconduct Effectively

AU - Wells, Michael

PY - 1989/1/1

Y1 - 1989/1/1

N2 - Professor Elliott begins his Article by proclaiming that “a fundamental revolution has reshaped the intellectual underpinnings of tort law.”

AB - Professor Elliott begins his Article by proclaiming that “a fundamental revolution has reshaped the intellectual underpinnings of tort law.”

KW - Tort Law

KW - Punitive Damages

KW - Corporate Liability

UR - https://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/fac_artchop/620

M3 - Article

JO - Default journal

JF - Default journal

ER -

Comments on Why Punitive Damages Don't Deter Corporate Misconduct Effectively

Abstract

Keywords

Disciplines

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this