Abstract
This Article challenges the general perception that ADR processes cannot develop public law norms. It follows a recent trend in ADR literature that seeks to define a public norm creation role for ADR in part by connecting these processes to other alternative legal and political problem-solving methods. This Article focuses on a recent South African Constitutional Court case, Occupiers of 51 Olivia Road v City of Johannesburg, in which the court interpreted the right to housing in the South African Constitution. The court held that municipalities must develop processes for negotiating - or, in the court's language "engaging" - with citizens affected by redevelopment plans, to analyze how claims about the norm-creation potential of ADR processes could be developed in the context of constitutional adjudication of socioeconomic rights.
| Original language | American English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Utah Law Review |
| Volume | 2009 |
| State | Published - Jan 1 2009 |
Keywords
- South African Constitutional Court
- housing rights
- engagement
- Olivia Road
- socioeconomic rights
- alternative dispute resolution
Disciplines
- Comparative and Foreign Law
- Courts
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration
- Human Rights Law