Extending the Shadow of the Law: Using Hybrid Mechanisms to Establish Constitutional Norms in Socioeconomic Rights Cases

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    This Article challenges the general perception that ADR processes cannot develop public law norms. It follows a recent trend in ADR literature that seeks to define a public norm creation role for ADR in part by connecting these processes to other alternative legal and political problem-solving methods. This Article focuses on a recent South African Constitutional Court case, Occupiers of 51 Olivia Road v City of Johannesburg, in which the court interpreted the right to housing in the South African Constitution. The court held that municipalities must develop processes for negotiating - or, in the court's language "engaging" - with citizens affected by redevelopment plans, to analyze how claims about the norm-creation potential of ADR processes could be developed in the context of constitutional adjudication of socioeconomic rights.

    Original languageAmerican English
    JournalUtah Law Review
    Volume2009
    StatePublished - Jan 1 2009

    Keywords

    • South African Constitutional Court
    • housing rights
    • engagement
    • Olivia Road
    • socioeconomic rights
    • alternative dispute resolution

    Disciplines

    • Comparative and Foreign Law
    • Courts
    • Dispute Resolution and Arbitration
    • Human Rights Law

    Cite this