Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Ideology and History

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    I do not dispute the philosophical validity of the theory of natural rights. Indeed, I support much, if not most, of the principles embodied in that theory. What I wish to discuss is that to which Dr. Vieira claims to have limited his discussion, viz., the belief that history, specifically American constitutional history, provides a sufficient base to support a natural rights theory. His attempt to find historical support is an instructive example of how ideology can distort the data of history and cause it to be portrayed in a strange and unreal light. Beyond that, Vieira's historical method also weakens the logical framework of his argument.

    Original languageAmerican English
    JournalGeorgia Law Review
    StatePublished - Jan 1 1979

    Keywords

    • natural law
    • Constitution
    • positivism
    • Dr. Edwin Vieira
    • Jr.

    Disciplines

    • Constitutional Law
    • Jurisprudence
    • Legal History

    Cite this