iOhio v. American Express/i: Clarence Thomas Sets Sail on a Sea of Doubt, and, Mirabile Dictu, It’s Still a Bad Idea

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Keywords

@article{c97bb9dccd7f4d098206d362d786bd65,

title = "iOhio v. American Express/i: Clarence Thomas Sets Sail on a Sea of Doubt, and, Mirabile Dictu, It{\textquoteright}s Still a Bad Idea",

keywords = "merger, antitrust, credit cards, markets, monopoly, Ohio v. American Express, U.S. Supreme Court, Justice Clarence Thomas, swipe fees",

author = "Chris Sagers",

year = "2018",

month = jun,

day = "27",

language = "American English",

journal = "Pro-Market",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - iOhio v. American Express/i: Clarence Thomas Sets Sail on a Sea of Doubt, and, Mirabile Dictu, It’s Still a Bad Idea

AU - Sagers, Chris

PY - 2018/6/27

Y1 - 2018/6/27

KW - merger

KW - antitrust

KW - credit cards

KW - markets

KW - monopoly

KW - Ohio v. American Express

KW - U.S. Supreme Court

KW - Justice Clarence Thomas

KW - swipe fees

UR - https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/fac_articles/944

UR - https://perma.cc/BM5U-EZTU

M3 - Article

JO - Pro-Market

JF - Pro-Market

ER -