Abstract
This post explores the legal, political, and administrative issues that would need to be addressed prior to the establishment of a single residual mechanism. The discussion in this post, as in Post I and Post III, is informed by a series of interviews conducted with experts in the field of international criminal law with experience in various ad hoc and hybrid international tribunals.
As the symposium’s first post suggests, establishing a single residual mechanism is not a simple, purely administrative endeavor, especially if the goal is to consolidate all existing and future tribunals and mechanisms. Creating a single entity raises many thorny legal, political, and administrative issues with which the international community will have to wrestle with to go from a blueprint on paper to a brick-and-mortar institution. The final post in the symposium will outline three proposals for how a single residual mechanism could be structured in light of these considerations.
| Original language | American English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Just Security |
| State | Published - Mar 18 2024 |
Keywords
- single residual mechanism
- state consent
- prosecutorial mandate
- Security Council
Disciplines
- Comparative and Foreign Law
- International Humanitarian Law
- International Law
- Law
Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS