Motion for Preliminary Injunction Against Akron's Anti-Panhandling Ordinance

Joseph Mead

Motion for Preliminary Injunction Against Akron's Anti-Panhandling Ordinance

Joseph Mead

Cleveland State University

Research output: Other contribution

Abstract

Brief filed in Hill v. City of Akron, Case Number 5:16-cv-01061 (N.D. Ohio), arguing that Akron's anti-panhandling ordinance violates the First Amendment.

Original language	American English
State	Published - May 3 2016

Disciplines

First Amendment
Law and Society
Urban Studies and Planning

Access to Document

Hill v Akron PI as filed.pdfFinal published version, 9.08 MBLicense: Unspecified

Cite this

@misc{8c8f0a7d71274969b4d83491b992a804,

title = "Motion for Preliminary Injunction Against Akron's Anti-Panhandling Ordinance",

abstract = " Brief filed in Hill v. City of Akron, Case Number 5:16-cv-01061 (N.D. Ohio), arguing that Akron's anti-panhandling ordinance violates the First Amendment.",

author = "Joseph Mead",

year = "2016",

month = may,

day = "3",

language = "American English",

type = "Other",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Motion for Preliminary Injunction Against Akron's Anti-Panhandling Ordinance

AU - Mead, Joseph

PY - 2016/5/3

Y1 - 2016/5/3

N2 - Brief filed in Hill v. City of Akron, Case Number 5:16-cv-01061 (N.D. Ohio), arguing that Akron's anti-panhandling ordinance violates the First Amendment.

AB - Brief filed in Hill v. City of Akron, Case Number 5:16-cv-01061 (N.D. Ohio), arguing that Akron's anti-panhandling ordinance violates the First Amendment.

M3 - Other contribution

ER -