TY - JOUR
T1 - Multiplexed Predictive Control of a Large Commercial Turbofan Engine
AU - Richter, Hanz
AU - Singaraju, Anil V.
AU - Litt, Jonathan S.
N1 - Richter, H., Singaraju, A. V., and Litt, J. S., 2008, "Multiplexed Predictive Control of a Large Commercial Turbofan Engine," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 31(2) pp. 273-281.
PY - 2008/1/1
Y1 - 2008/1/1
N2 - Model predictive control is a strategy well-suited to handle the highly complex, nonlinear, uncertain, and constrained dynamics involved in aircraft engine control problems. However, it has thus far been infeasible to implement model predictive control in engine control applications, because of the combination of model complexity and the time allotted for the control update calculation. In this paper, a multiplexed implementation is proposed that dramatically reduces the computational burden of the quadratic programming optimization that must be solved online as part of the model-predictive-control algorithm. Actuator updates are calculated sequentially and cyclically in a multiplexed implementation, as opposed to the simultaneous optimization taking place in conventional model predictive control. Theoretical aspects are discussed based on a nominal model, and actual computational savings are demonstrated using a realistic commercial engine model.
AB - Model predictive control is a strategy well-suited to handle the highly complex, nonlinear, uncertain, and constrained dynamics involved in aircraft engine control problems. However, it has thus far been infeasible to implement model predictive control in engine control applications, because of the combination of model complexity and the time allotted for the control update calculation. In this paper, a multiplexed implementation is proposed that dramatically reduces the computational burden of the quadratic programming optimization that must be solved online as part of the model-predictive-control algorithm. Actuator updates are calculated sequentially and cyclically in a multiplexed implementation, as opposed to the simultaneous optimization taking place in conventional model predictive control. Theoretical aspects are discussed based on a nominal model, and actual computational savings are demonstrated using a realistic commercial engine model.
UR - https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/enme_facpub/299
U2 - 10.2514/1.30591
DO - 10.2514/1.30591
M3 - Article
VL - 31
JO - Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics
JF - Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics
ER -