Regional Dashboard of Economic Indicators 2009: Comparative Performance of Leading, Midwest, and Northeast Ohio Metropolitan Areas

Ziona Austrian; Afia Yamoah; Candice Clouse

Regional Dashboard of Economic Indicators 2009: Comparative Performance of Leading, Midwest, and Northeast Ohio Metropolitan Areas

Ziona Austrian, Afia Yamoah, Candice Clouse

Research output: Other contribution

Abstract

<p> The objective of this study is to continue monitoring the economic performance of Northeast Ohio’s (NEO) metropolitan areas over time and in comparison to other metropolitan areas across the United States, particularly leading metropolitan areas and other large metro areas located in the Midwest. The study monitors economic conditions prior to the current recession. This fourth study of dashboard indicators describes the findings using the framework that was developed in previous studies. It uses the same four measures of economic growth and nine dashboard indicators and their underlying variables for 136 metropolitan areas with population between 300,000 and 3.5 million. The NEO region is represented by its four Metropolitan Statistical Areas, including Akron, Canton&hyphen;Massillon, Cleveland&hyphen;Elyria&hyphen;Mentor, and Youngstown&hyphen;Warren&hyphen;Boardman.</p>

Original language	American English
State	Published - Jul 1 2009

Keywords

economic development
ecology of innovation
entrepreneurship
economic analysis of cities and regions
economic development strategy and policy

Disciplines

Growth and Development
Urban Studies
Urban Studies and Planning

Access to Document

Regional Dashboard of Economic Indicators 2009 Comparative PerfoFinal published version, 1.03 MBLicense: CC BY

Cite this

@misc{505ecd6cc24041a88ec10256a2c1a190,

title = "Regional Dashboard of Economic Indicators 2009: Comparative Performance of Leading, Midwest, and Northeast Ohio Metropolitan Areas",

abstract = " The objective of this study is to continue monitoring the economic performance of Northeast Ohio\’s (NEO) metropolitan areas over time and in comparison to other metropolitan areas across the United States, particularly leading metropolitan areas and other large metro areas located in the Midwest. The study monitors economic conditions prior to the current recession. This fourth study of dashboard indicators describes the findings using the framework that was developed in previous studies. It uses the same four measures of economic growth and nine dashboard indicators and their underlying variables for 136 metropolitan areas with population between 300,000 and 3.5 million. The NEO region is represented by its four Metropolitan Statistical Areas, including Akron, Canton\&hyphen;Massillon, Cleveland\&hyphen;Elyria\&hyphen;Mentor, and Youngstown\&hyphen;Warren\&hyphen;Boardman.",

keywords = "economic development, ecology of innovation, entrepreneurship, economic analysis of cities and regions, economic development strategy and policy",

author = "Ziona Austrian and Afia Yamoah and Candice Clouse",

year = "2009",

month = jul,

day = "1",

language = "American English",

type = "Other",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Regional Dashboard of Economic Indicators 2009: Comparative Performance of Leading, Midwest, and Northeast Ohio Metropolitan Areas

AU - Austrian, Ziona

AU - Yamoah, Afia

AU - Clouse, Candice

PY - 2009/7/1

Y1 - 2009/7/1

N2 - The objective of this study is to continue monitoring the economic performance of Northeast Ohio’s (NEO) metropolitan areas over time and in comparison to other metropolitan areas across the United States, particularly leading metropolitan areas and other large metro areas located in the Midwest. The study monitors economic conditions prior to the current recession. This fourth study of dashboard indicators describes the findings using the framework that was developed in previous studies. It uses the same four measures of economic growth and nine dashboard indicators and their underlying variables for 136 metropolitan areas with population between 300,000 and 3.5 million. The NEO region is represented by its four Metropolitan Statistical Areas, including Akron, Canton&hyphen;Massillon, Cleveland&hyphen;Elyria&hyphen;Mentor, and Youngstown&hyphen;Warren&hyphen;Boardman.

AB - The objective of this study is to continue monitoring the economic performance of Northeast Ohio’s (NEO) metropolitan areas over time and in comparison to other metropolitan areas across the United States, particularly leading metropolitan areas and other large metro areas located in the Midwest. The study monitors economic conditions prior to the current recession. This fourth study of dashboard indicators describes the findings using the framework that was developed in previous studies. It uses the same four measures of economic growth and nine dashboard indicators and their underlying variables for 136 metropolitan areas with population between 300,000 and 3.5 million. The NEO region is represented by its four Metropolitan Statistical Areas, including Akron, Canton&hyphen;Massillon, Cleveland&hyphen;Elyria&hyphen;Mentor, and Youngstown&hyphen;Warren&hyphen;Boardman.

KW - economic development

KW - ecology of innovation

KW - entrepreneurship

KW - economic analysis of cities and regions

KW - economic development strategy and policy

UR - https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/urban_facpub/217

M3 - Other contribution

ER -

Regional Dashboard of Economic Indicators 2009: Comparative Performance of Leading, Midwest, and Northeast Ohio Metropolitan Areas

Abstract

Keywords

Disciplines

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this