Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Sign Regulation After City of Ladue v. Gilleo: Still No Answer to the Problem of Content-Based Regulations

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Drafting legally defensible sign regulations presents a major challenge to government. If a sign ordinance adopts the common technique of prohibiting all signs in a particular district, with certain specified exceptions, it may be struck down as an invalid content-based regulation. If a city tries to avoid that problem by eliminating the exceptions, the ordinance may be invalid because it prohibits all signs in the district. This article examines whether the U.S. Supreme Court's most recent sign case provides any help to communities struggling with the sign regulation problem.

    Original languageAmerican English
    JournalZoning Planning Law Report
    Volume17
    StatePublished - Jan 1 1994

    Keywords

    • free speech
    • First Amendment
    • content based regulation
    • sign regulation
    • billboard regulation

    Disciplines

    • First Amendment
    • Land Use Law
    • Urban Studies

    Cite this