Supreme Court Watch

Reginald Oh

Supreme Court Watch

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Oh discusses how the U.S. Supreme Court, in General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc. v. Cline , 124 S. Ct. 1236 (2004), settled a circuit court conflict over the viability of "reverse age discriminations" claim under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). The Court, in a 6-3 decision, held that statutorily protected workers over the age of forty may not bring an ADEA claim alleging that their employer discriminated against them in favor of older employees.

Original language	American English
Journal	State and Local Law News
Volume	27
State	Published - Jul 1 2004

Keywords

Age Discrimination in Employment Act
Supreme Court

Disciplines

Civil Rights and Discrimination
Labor and Employment Law
Law

Access to Document

Supreme Court WatchFinal published version, 283 KBLicense: CC BY

Cite this

@article{5f6a7dbee90a4d109e2a81d120faaadf,

title = "Supreme Court Watch",

abstract = " Oh discusses how the U.S. Supreme Court, in General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc. v. Cline , 124 S. Ct. 1236 (2004), settled a circuit court conflict over the viability of {"}reverse age discriminations{"} claim under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). The Court, in a 6-3 decision, held that statutorily protected workers over the age of forty may not bring an ADEA claim alleging that their employer discriminated against them in favor of older employees.",

keywords = "Age Discrimination in Employment Act, Supreme Court",

author = "Reginald Oh",

year = "2004",

month = jul,

day = "1",

language = "American English",

volume = "27",

journal = "State and Local Law News",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Supreme Court Watch

AU - Oh, Reginald

PY - 2004/7/1

Y1 - 2004/7/1

N2 - Oh discusses how the U.S. Supreme Court, in General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc. v. Cline , 124 S. Ct. 1236 (2004), settled a circuit court conflict over the viability of "reverse age discriminations" claim under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). The Court, in a 6-3 decision, held that statutorily protected workers over the age of forty may not bring an ADEA claim alleging that their employer discriminated against them in favor of older employees.

AB - Oh discusses how the U.S. Supreme Court, in General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc. v. Cline , 124 S. Ct. 1236 (2004), settled a circuit court conflict over the viability of "reverse age discriminations" claim under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). The Court, in a 6-3 decision, held that statutorily protected workers over the age of forty may not bring an ADEA claim alleging that their employer discriminated against them in favor of older employees.

KW - Age Discrimination in Employment Act

KW - Supreme Court

UR - https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/fac_articles/1029

M3 - Article

VL - 27

JO - State and Local Law News

JF - State and Local Law News

ER -

Supreme Court Watch

Abstract

Keywords

Disciplines

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this