Supreme Court Watch

Reginald Oh

Supreme Court Watch

Reginald Oh

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Discusses the March 1, 2005 U.S. Supreme Court decision regarding the constitutionality of the death penalty in Roper v. Simmons , 125 S. Ct. 1183 (2005). The Court held that the death penalty cannot be applied to individuals under the age of eighteen at the time the crime was committed without violating the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment.

Original language	American English
Journal	State and Local Law News
Volume	28
State	Published - Jul 1 2005

Keywords

Supreme Court

Disciplines

Constitutional Law
Law

Access to Document

Supreme Court WatchFinal published version, 295 KBLicense: CC BY

Cite this

@article{c3268a8e59474e83baddce62cdab64a1,

title = "Supreme Court Watch",

abstract = " Discusses the March 1, 2005 U.S. Supreme Court decision regarding the constitutionality of the death penalty in Roper v. Simmons , 125 S. Ct. 1183 (2005). The Court held that the death penalty cannot be applied to individuals under the age of eighteen at the time the crime was committed without violating the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment.",

keywords = "Supreme Court",

author = "Reginald Oh",

year = "2005",

month = jul,

day = "1",

language = "American English",

volume = "28",

journal = "State and Local Law News",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Supreme Court Watch

AU - Oh, Reginald

PY - 2005/7/1

Y1 - 2005/7/1

N2 - Discusses the March 1, 2005 U.S. Supreme Court decision regarding the constitutionality of the death penalty in Roper v. Simmons , 125 S. Ct. 1183 (2005). The Court held that the death penalty cannot be applied to individuals under the age of eighteen at the time the crime was committed without violating the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment.

AB - Discusses the March 1, 2005 U.S. Supreme Court decision regarding the constitutionality of the death penalty in Roper v. Simmons , 125 S. Ct. 1183 (2005). The Court held that the death penalty cannot be applied to individuals under the age of eighteen at the time the crime was committed without violating the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment.

KW - Supreme Court

UR - https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/fac_articles/1040

M3 - Article

VL - 28

JO - State and Local Law News

JF - State and Local Law News

ER -

Supreme Court Watch

Abstract

Keywords

Disciplines

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this