Supreme Court Watch

Reginald Oh

Supreme Court Watch

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Professor Oh briefly describes Locke v. Davey in which the U.S. Supreme Court, in its 2003-04 term, attempted to clarify its First Amendment jurisprudence on the religion clauses. In a 7-2 decision, the Court held that the State of Washington did not violate the First Amendment Free Exercise Clause by denying government financial aid to college students seeking to pursue a course of study in religious devotional studies.

Original language	American English
Journal	State and Local Law News
Volume	27
State	Published - Apr 1 2004

Keywords

First Amendment Free Exercise Clause
Supreme Court

Disciplines

First Amendment
Law
Religion Law

Access to Document

Supreme Court WatchFinal published version, 312 KBLicense: CC BY

Cite this

@article{83c939acacb84cd480368b42279166db,

title = "Supreme Court Watch",

abstract = " Professor Oh briefly describes Locke v. Davey in which the U.S. Supreme Court, in its 2003-04 term, attempted to clarify its First Amendment jurisprudence on the religion clauses. In a 7-2 decision, the Court held that the State of Washington did not violate the First Amendment Free Exercise Clause by denying government financial aid to college students seeking to pursue a course of study in religious devotional studies.",

keywords = "First Amendment Free Exercise Clause, Supreme Court",

author = "Reginald Oh",

year = "2004",

month = apr,

day = "1",

language = "American English",

volume = "27",

journal = "State and Local Law News",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Supreme Court Watch

AU - Oh, Reginald

PY - 2004/4/1

Y1 - 2004/4/1

N2 - Professor Oh briefly describes Locke v. Davey in which the U.S. Supreme Court, in its 2003-04 term, attempted to clarify its First Amendment jurisprudence on the religion clauses. In a 7-2 decision, the Court held that the State of Washington did not violate the First Amendment Free Exercise Clause by denying government financial aid to college students seeking to pursue a course of study in religious devotional studies.

AB - Professor Oh briefly describes Locke v. Davey in which the U.S. Supreme Court, in its 2003-04 term, attempted to clarify its First Amendment jurisprudence on the religion clauses. In a 7-2 decision, the Court held that the State of Washington did not violate the First Amendment Free Exercise Clause by denying government financial aid to college students seeking to pursue a course of study in religious devotional studies.

KW - First Amendment Free Exercise Clause

KW - Supreme Court

UR - https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/fac_articles/1028

M3 - Article

VL - 27

JO - State and Local Law News

JF - State and Local Law News

ER -

Supreme Court Watch

Abstract

Keywords

Disciplines

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this