Abstract
The Ukraine crisis is an example of modern-day conflict which poses various accountability challenges and demonstrates that not a single existing prosecutorial mechanism is capable of achieving a full measure of accountability while fulfilling the different goals of international criminal justice. As discussed in this Article, the prosecution of a sufficient number of Russian perpetrators of atrocities, as well as of Russian leaders, conducted legitimately and effectively, will necessitate the utilization of almost all accountability models - Ukrainian courts, a war crime chamber, the ICC, as well as an ad hoc aggression tribunal. The Ukrainian crisis demonstrates that all international courts and tribunals remain relevant, and that those concerned with achieving accountability, whether in Ukraine or elsewhere, will need to continue to use all such different courts and tribunals.
| Original language | American English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law |
| Volume | 55 |
| State | Published - Jan 1 2023 |
Keywords
- Ukraine
- Russia
- atrocities
- criminal justice
- International Criminal Court (ICC)
Disciplines
- Comparative and Foreign Law
- Criminal Law
- International Humanitarian Law
- International Law
- Law