Abstract
Dismissal of a federal complaint, for failure to state a claim, could only be allowed if "it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim..." Then along came Twombly . Bell Atlantic v. Twombly, 127 S.Ct. 1955 (2007) is a case that involves complex, federal, antitrust class action. To most scholars, Twombly has important implications for antitrust litigators. And, it may also be part of a pattern reflecting closer judicial scrutiny of other complex litigation or class action complaints filed in federal court, and perhaps even in state court. Indeed, it may result in a new balance in the tension between the objective of providing meaningful court access to plaintiffs, and the goal of preventing discovery abuse to coerce settlements.
| Original language | American English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Ohio Business Law Journal |
| Volume | 2 |
| State | Published - Jul 1 2007 |
Keywords
- twombly
- Fed. Civ. R. 8
- civil rule 8
- complaint
- failure to state a claim
- sufficiency of pleading
- plausibility
- antitrust
Disciplines
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Civil Procedure
- Law