Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Waiting with Brother Thomas

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    In this Essay, Christopher Sagers argues that those schools of thought that could be called "doubtful"—that is, those predicated on suspicion of belief to some degree—share a range of similarities and, more importantly, are attacked through a set of common criticisms. He argues that the fundamental criticism of these "doubtful" schools of thought—that doubt leads us to nihilism and therefore must be bad—is a non sequitur. Furthermore, he continues, we reject doubt not because it is bad, but because it is difficult. Ultimately, he suggests ways to face the problems of nihilism or, rather, ways of understanding them as other than problems.

    Original languageAmerican English
    JournalUCLA Law Review
    Volume46
    StatePublished - Dec 1 1998

    Keywords

    • agnosticism
    • nihilism

    Disciplines

    • Law
    • Legal Writing and Research

    Cite this