Workmen's Compensation - Evidence - Opinion of Non-Treating Psychiatrist Based on Claimant's Statements Held Inadmissible - Candella v. Subsequent Injury Fund

Kevin F. O'Neill

Workmen's Compensation - Evidence - Opinion of Non-Treating Psychiatrist Based on Claimant's Statements Held Inadmissible - Candella v. Subsequent Injury Fund

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Discusses evidentiary requirements in Workers' Compensation cases and circuit court review of Workers' Compensation Commission decisions.

Original language	American English
Journal	University of Baltimore Law Review
Volume	6
State	Published - Oct 1 1976

Keywords

workers' compensation law
evidence
labor law
employment law

Disciplines

Labor and Employment Law
Law

Access to Document

Workmens Compensation - Evidence - Opinion of Non-Treating PsychFinal published version, 750 KBLicense: CC BY

Cite this

@article{46acee63f7304d0cb0288bd43b99bdb1,

title = "Workmen's Compensation - Evidence - Opinion of Non-Treating Psychiatrist Based on Claimant's Statements Held Inadmissible - Candella v. Subsequent Injury Fund",

abstract = " Discusses evidentiary requirements in Workers' Compensation cases and circuit court review of Workers' Compensation Commission decisions.",

keywords = "workers' compensation law, evidence, labor law, employment law",

author = "O'Neill, \{Kevin F.\}",

year = "1976",

month = oct,

day = "1",

language = "American English",

volume = "6",

journal = "University of Baltimore Law Review",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Workmen's Compensation - Evidence - Opinion of Non-Treating Psychiatrist Based on Claimant's Statements Held Inadmissible - Candella v. Subsequent Injury Fund

AU - O'Neill, Kevin F.

PY - 1976/10/1

Y1 - 1976/10/1

N2 - Discusses evidentiary requirements in Workers' Compensation cases and circuit court review of Workers' Compensation Commission decisions.

AB - Discusses evidentiary requirements in Workers' Compensation cases and circuit court review of Workers' Compensation Commission decisions.

KW - workers' compensation law

KW - evidence

KW - labor law

KW - employment law

UR - https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/fac_articles/1016

M3 - Article

VL - 6

JO - University of Baltimore Law Review

JF - University of Baltimore Law Review

ER -

Workmen's Compensation - Evidence - Opinion of Non-Treating Psychiatrist Based on Claimant's Statements Held Inadmissible - Candella v. Subsequent Injury Fund

Abstract

Keywords

Disciplines

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this